Parental Authority, Religion, Gender Perspectives, and School Curriculum: the Pacheco case

Authors

  • Amelia Alva Ghent University (Bélgica)
  • Rodrigo Céspedes Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology (Halle/Saale: Alemania)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7764/RLDR.9.120

Keywords:

religious freedom, parental authority, gender perspectives, school curriculum, equality and non-discrimination

Abstract

This judgment decided on the inclusion of gender perspectives in a school curriculum in order to promote equality. The applicants argued the violation of parental rights to guide the education of children and the absence of parent participation in the elaboration of norms regulating school education. The court upheld the government’ arguments, finding that equality and the non-discrimination principle, which are acknowledged under the Peruvian Constitution and several human rights treaties, may validly restrict parental authority.

Author Biographies

Amelia Alva, Ghent University (Bélgica)

Associated postdoctoral research fellow, Human Rights Centre, Ghent University. 

Rodrigo Céspedes, Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology (Halle/Saale: Alemania)

Senior research fellow, Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology (Halle/Saale), Department of Law & Anthropology. 

Published

2020-06-26